What is the test for making a threat of physical harm in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, E054701 (Cal. App. 2013):
Although defendant is correct that the threat must be to impose some serious consequence, a threat of physical harm is not required. In People v. Majors, supra, 33
Page 36
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been convicted of a charge of making threats to kill or make a threat to kill? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would change the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who made a threat to set fire to a building after making the threat, setting fire to the victim's workplace after the threat was made? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a properly instructed jury would have acquitted defendant of criminal threat but convicted her of making criminal threat? (California, United States of America)
