The following excerpt is from In re Outlaw Lab., LP Litig., Case No.: 3:18-cv-840-GPC-BGS, c/w 3:18-cv-1882-GPC-BGS (S.D. Cal. 2019):
477 U.S. at 324. The non-moving party must "do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts." Sluimer v. Verity, Inc., 606 F.3d 584, 587 (9th Cir. 2010). If the non-moving party fails to make a sufficient showing of an element of its case, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. at 325.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.