What is the test for making a statement of decision in a non-jury trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Warren v. Carroll, A127927 (Cal. App. 2011):

Upon timely request of a party in a nonjury trial, a trial court must render a statement of decision addressing the factual and legal bases for its decision as to each of the principal controverted issues in the case. (Code Civ. Proc., 632; Muzquiz v. City of Emeryville (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1106, 1124.) However, the statement of decision need not address all the issues raised by the parties, but merely the ultimate facts on which the decision is based. (Id. at pp. 1124-1125.) Furthermore, even if a court fails to make a finding on a particular matter, the omission is harmless if the judgment is otherwise supported, unless the evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding in favor of the

Page 11

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a judge make a statement of decision after a trial? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a judge has found that a trial judge made a "minor error" in making decisions in a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making an objection to prejudicial comments in the opening statement of a trial? (California, United States of America)
What difference does a hung jury at the penalty phase of a criminal trial make to the outcome of the guilt trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
Is an improper statement in a jury trial admissible to show the effect on the jurors' mental processes of other, improper statements? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's extrajudicial statements form part of the prosecution's evidence, does the trial court have to instruct sua sponte that a finding of guilt cannot be predicated on the statements alone? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
Does a deputy district attorney acquiesce in having the motion heard during the trial of a defendant before trial, rather than prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.