What is the test for limiting the scope of a defendant's review to the evidence supporting the findings of the trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Walnut Manor Assoc.s v. Keys, C057198, No.CV991464 (Cal. App. 2010):
Defendant argues that in reviewing the record to determine if substantial evidence supports the actual or implied findings of the trial court, we must restrict our review to the evidence supporting the judgment and disregard anything to the contrary. She cites as support Nestle v. City of Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920, where the high court said: "In resolving the issue
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting the finding that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any evidence to support her claim that the court failed to review the supporting documents to determine whether attorney fees requested were reasonable in need and amount? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
