What is the test for limiting defense counsel's cross-examination?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Luna, B269629 (Cal. App. 2018):

The court used harsh terms to underscore the irrelevance of defense counsel's questioning. It did nothing more. Its comments did not touch on the presumption of innocence. Defendant's argument that his cross-examination was improperly limited lacks merit because a defendant is not entitled to ask irrelevant questions. " '[T]he trial court retains wide latitude in restricting cross-examination that is repetitive, prejudicial, confusing of the issues, or of marginal relevance.' " (People v. Chatman (2006) 38 Cal.4th 344, 372.)

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Try it today free of charge!

The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.

Other Questions

Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)

If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)

Is a limitation on counsel's general voir dire limited preventing the defense from eliciting juror bias? (California, United States of America)

Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)

Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)

Can a prosecutor impugently call the integrity of defense counsel by asserting defense counsel would lose their bar cards if they argued in favor of voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)

When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)

Can a prosecutor commit misconduct if he or she attacks the integrity of defense counsel or casts aspersions on defense counsel? (California, United States of America)

Is it misconduct for a prosecutor to imply that defense counsel has fabricated evidence or otherwise to portray defense counsel as the villain in the case? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for limiting defense counsel's cross-examination?

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Other Questions

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.

Company

Product

Resources