What is the test for judicial review of a defense attorney's closing argument?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Murrietta, H043157 (Cal. App. 2017):

deference to counsel's tactical decisions in his closing presentation is particularly important because of the broad range of legitimate defense strategy at that stage. Closing arguments should 'sharpen and clarify the issues for resolution by the trier of fact,' [citation], but which issues to sharpen and how best to clarify them are questions with many reasonable answers." (Yarborough v. Gentry (2003) 540 U.S. 1, 5-6.) Judicial review of a defense attorney's closing argument is therefore "highly deferential." (Id. at p. 6.)

Other Questions


Is there a reasonable likelihood that a prosecutor's comment at the closing argument was directed solely at the persuasive force of defense counsel's closing argument? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel who objected to the prosecutor's closing argument during closing argument at a civil trial have any right to an objection? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
In closing argument in a personal injury case, can the court admonish the appellant on appeal for failing to object to any statements in closing argument? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
In closing argument to a jury, in what circumstances will the jury be unable to hear closing arguments? (California, United States of America)
Is a judicial review of a decision of the State Bar recommending disbarment or suspension from practice an analogy between criminal proceedings and the resolution of reasonable doubts in the course of judicial review? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a defense attorney's tactical strategy in their closing argument? (California, United States of America)
What is the limitation on argument by the defense in the closing argument? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.