What is the test for invoking the rule of "right ruling, wrong reason"?

Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)

Does the rule that prevents a killer from profiting by his own wrong should not be invoked in such a way as to prejudice the rights of the other beneficiary? (California, United States of America)

Is there a reasonable likelihood that a jury would have understood the language of CALCRIM No. 370 to mean that motive is exempt from the rule requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)

Does a suspect who has received and understood the Miranda warning, and has not invoked his Miranda rights, waives his right to remain silent by making an uncoerced statement to the police? (California, United States of America)

How have courts interpreted the rule of reasonableness in the context of the reasonable use doctrine? (California, United States of America)

Is invasion of a defendant's personal right necessary to invoke the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule? (California, United States of America)

What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)

Does the absence of an explanation of a ruling make it more difficult for the appellate court to uphold the ruling as reasonable? (California, United States of America)

What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)