What is the test for interfering with the possession of a firearm by a minor offender?

Furthermore, we reject Bingham's argument the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment necessitates a strict scrutiny analysis. The Second Amendment permits " 'presumptively lawful regulatory measures' . . . , including 'longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons' " and logically also allows such prohibitions to extend to the possession of firearms by certain misdemeanants. (People v. Flores (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 568, 574-575, quoting District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) 554 U.S. 570, 626-627, & fn. 26.) "Heller intended by this language to put

Page 16

certain recognized prohibitions outside the ambit of the Second Amendment right it had delineated." (People v. Delacy, supra, 192 Cal.App.4th at p. 1491.) Thus, Bingham cannot claim interference with a " 'fundamental' right that would invoke elevated scrutiny under the equal protection clause." (Id. at p. 1495 [rational basis test applicable].)