The following excerpt is from Snipes v. Tilton, CASE NO. 06CV2531-LAB (AJB) (S.D. Cal. 2011):
ruling wasn't contrary to, nor did it involve an unreasonable application of clearly established law. See 28 U.S.C. 2254(d); Menefield v. Borg, 881 F.2d 696, 700 (9th Cir. 1989).
2. Interference with Investigator
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.