California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bonilla, F062175 (Cal. App. 2012):
It has been said that "[w]here a defendant 'denies any complicity in the crime charged, and thus lays no foundation for any verdict intermediate between "not guilty" and "guilty as charged" ... [] ... it is error to so instruct [on the lesser offense] because to do so would violate the fundamental rule that instructions must be pertinent to the evidence in the case at bar.' [Citation.]" (People v. Trimble (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1260.) Because jurors "are not required to make a binary choice between the prosecution evidence and the defense evidence," however, "if the evidence as a whole would support
Page 33
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.