What is the test for instructing a jury as to the possible motivations of a cooperating witness?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Gonzalez, 10-2381(L), 10-2945(Con) (2nd Cir. 2011):

In instructing a jury as to the possible motivations of a cooperating witness, "district courts need only fairly put the issue of a cooperating witness's possible motivations to the jury for its consideration and need not over-emphasize the obvious--that cooperators may have an interest in currying favor with the prosecutor that could affect the substance of their testimony." United States v. Vaughn, 430 F.3d 518, 523-24 (2d Cir. 2005). "As long as district courts intelligibly identify a cooperating witness's possible motivations for the jury's consideration, the cautionary charge given to the jury regarding a cooperating witness's testimony is sufficient." Id.

Other Questions


How have the courts dealt with the first instruction and second instruction in a motion to deny an instruction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a prejudicial error if a witness is a cooperating witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any cognizable prejudice against a possible witness or a potential witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a trial judge have the authority to instruct a child as a witness that they have witnessed an assault? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a witness entitled to be cross-examined on the basis of his own motivation for cooperating with the government? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does instruction 19 inadequately instructed the jury on their public authority defense? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a witness is unavailable to be extradited from the country where the witness is based? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can the Crown argue that answers obtained on the cross-examination of a witness can be used to attack the credibility of another witness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be able to argue that a witness has a strong motive to tell the truth? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can we reverse if the evidence supports the reasonable inference that by giving a nod to a witness that the witness was guilty of perjury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.