What is the test for instructing a defendant on a lesser included crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Diaz, E062324 (Cal. App. 2016):

"'In criminal cases, even absent a request, the trial court must instruct on general principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the evidence. [Citation.] This obligation includes giving instructions on lesser included offenses when the evidence raises a question whether all the elements of the charged offense were present, but not when there is no evidence the offense was less than that charged. [Citation.] The trial court must so instruct even when, as a matter of trial tactics, a defendant not only fails to request the instruction, but expressly objects to its being given.'" (People v. Moye (2009) 47 Cal.4th 537, 548.)

Other Questions


When a defendant is charged with conspiracy to commit a lesser included crime, what is the duty of the court to instruct the jury on all necessarily included offenses? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to be convicted of a lesser included or lesser included crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a duty to instruct the jury on its own motion concerning the crime of being an accessory after the fact as a lesser included crime of accessory to murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who requests instruction on a lesser-related charge of assault that includes the elements of implied malice murder be able to complain about the second degree murder instruction on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of an uncharged crime of a lesser included offense of a charged crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a sua sponte duty to instruct on torture as a lesser included crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both the lesser included and the greater included crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a sua sponte duty to instruct on torture as a lesser included crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both a greater crime and a necessarily included lesser crime for the same conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of the lesser included offense doctrine apply to a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of a related but not necessarily included crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.