California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, F066128 (Cal. App. 2014):
We exercise deferential scrutiny when reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, and consider the reasonableness of conduct based on circumstances as they stood at the time of counsel's actions or omissions. (People v. Harris (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 709, 714-715.)
"To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show both that counsel's performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. [Citations.] Counsel's performance was deficient if the representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms. [Citation.] Prejudice exists where there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. [Citation.]" (People v. Benavides (2005) 35 Cal.4th 69, 92-93.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.