The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Aldi, 101 F.3d 682 (2nd Cir. 1996):
This conclusion directly follows the reasoning this court employed in United States v. Beverly, 5 F.3d 633 (2d Cir.1993). In Beverly, the defendant appealed his conviction for use of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in Albany. At trial, the defendant testified on direct that he had never possessed a firearm in Albany, and that he had almost no familiarity with guns. 5 F.3d at 640. The government impeached the defendant by asking him about pending state charges for prior shootings.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.