California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from L.G. v. M.B., 235 Cal.Rptr.3d 494, 25 Cal.App.5th 211 (Cal. App. 2018):
Appellant argues that the two judges' decisions granting her requests for temporary restraining orders in the dissolution action and in her separate civil harassment action against Respondent established as a matter of law that she had "reasonable and probable cause for believing the truth of" the allegations she made about Respondent. Appellant analogizes to the doctrine applied in malicious prosecution actions commonly called the " interim adverse judgment rule. " ( Parrish v. Latham & Watkins (2017) 3 Cal.5th 767, 771, 221 Cal.Rptr.3d 432, 400 P.3d 1 ( Parrish ).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.