What is the test for giving a jury a self-defense instruction sua sponte?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Vargas, B278939 (Cal. App. 2018):

A trial court has a duty to instruct the jury "'sua sponte on general principles which are closely and openly connected with the facts before the court.'" (People v. Abilez (2007) 41 Cal.4th 472, 517.) Despite the insistence by defendant's trial counsel that

Page 8

she was not relying on self-defense and her agreement that it was error to have given the instruction as part of CALCRIM No. 875 in the first place, the trial court was required to give a self-defense instruction sua sponte "if there is substantial evidence supportive of such a defense and the defense is not inconsistent with the defendant's theory of the case." (People v. Dominguez (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1141, 1148, internal quotation marks omitted.)

Other Questions


When there is evidence of an accomplice giving instructions to a jury in a criminal case, what is the duty of the trial court to give the jury instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have a sua sponte duty to give unanimity instruction in a murder case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
Does the instruction that the jury was to follow the instructions if an attorney's comments appeared to be in conflict with the instructions apply? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have a sua sponte duty to give a bracketed portion of instruction in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Can a party argue on appeal that the court failed to give a specific instruction when that party did not request such instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does a court need to give Sua sponte a cautionary instruction that testimony pertaining to the flight be viewed with caution? (California, United States of America)
(1) Does the trial court have a sua sponte duty to give instructions and verdict forms on crime B if warranted by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have a duty to give sua sponte instructions on a lesser included offense barred by the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.