What is the test for giving a judge an opportunity to rule on the merits of an objection before the evidence is introduced?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from First Cmty. Bank v. Bank of the W., A134168 (Cal. App. 2013):
reasonable opportunity to rule on the merits of the objection before the evidence was introduced." (Melendez v. Pliler (9th Cir. 2002) 288 F.3d 1120, 1125.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the consequence of a judge allowing evidence of improper lay opinion to be introduced without objection? (California, United States of America)
Is there substantial evidence to support the instruction that a judge must only give the instruction which is supported by substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does evidence that violates Evidence Code section 1150 need to be objected at trial to preserve the contention on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that a judge who ruled on a motion for fees was not the judge who presided over the merits litigation have any impact on the standard of review? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 356 of the California Evidence Code on a witness giving evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 356 of the Alberta Evidence Code on a witness giving evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a judge's comment on the evidence that the defense argued that the evidence presented before the jury was "objectionable to the prosecution" sufficient to constitute misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defense objection to the question "assumed facts not in evidence" or "misstated evidence"? (California, United States of America)
