California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Jane Doe v. Walmart Stores, Inc., G054660 (Cal. App. 2018):
Just as important, "the prime concern in every case [is] foreseeability, because that factor is the chief element in determining a defendant's duty to [a] plaintiff." (Newton v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1986) 184 Cal.App.3d 386, 389.) The "determination of foreseeability [is] to be made on a case-by-case basis." (Id. at p. 390.) If considered only in the abstract, "the quest for foreseeability is endless because [it], like light, travels indefinitely in a vacuum." (Id. at p. 391.) Thus, as to foreseeability, "the court's task in determining duty 'is not to decide whether a particular plaintiff's injury was reasonably foreseeable in light of a particular defendant's conduct, but rather to
Page 12
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.