California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jake, C056136 (Cal. App. 10/28/2008), C056136 (Cal. App. 2008):
According to defendant, these six segments were admissible because they had "some bearing" on the already-admitted portions of the telephone calls and were necessary to place the admitted portions of the calls in context and to avoid a misleading impression. We review defendant's argument concerning the exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion. (People v. Alvarez (1996) 14 Cal.4th 155, 201.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.