What is the test for excluding prejudicial evidence at trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Ramirez, F058326, No. BF126086A (Cal. App. 2010):
"'. In other words, evidence should be excluded as unduly prejudicial when it is of such nature as to inflame the emotions of the jury, motivating them to use the information, not to logically evaluate the point upon which it is relevant, but to reward or punish one side because of the jurors' emotional reaction [Citation.]" (People v. Branch, supra, 91 Cal.App.4th at p. 286.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion to exclude prejudicial evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for excluding "prejudicial" evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the power of the trial court to exclude evidence under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant exclude evidence that is prejudicial to the codefendant under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a reciprocal obligation to disclose all relevant evidence obtained before trial, including rebuttal evidence it intends to use at trial? (California, United States of America)
