What is the test for evidence under Rule 404(b)?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Bailleaux, 685 F.2d 1105 (9th Cir. 1982):

1 Although we stated in United States v. Herrera-Medina, 609 F.2d 376 (9th Cir. 1979), that the prior criminal conduct offered into evidence must be similar to the offense charged, this prerequisite obviously does not apply to all evidence offered under Rule 404(b). If the purpose of the proffered evidence is to show that the defendant's prior criminal conduct provided him with opportunity, knowledge, preparation or motive, it may or may not be necessary that the prior conduct be similar to the offense charged. But when evidence is offered to prove identity, modus operandi, or absence of mistake or accident, the prior criminal conduct is relevant only if it is similar to the offense charged.

Other Questions


Can the notebooks used as evidence under Section 404(b) of the Criminal Code be taken as evidence in a criminal case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How is the admission of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a finding admitting evidence of other acts under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can evidence be considered other crimes evidence under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a district court's decision not to admit evidence within the scope of the Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of other crimes pursuant to Rule of Evidence 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can prior act evidence be admitted under Rule 404(b)(2) to demonstrate absence of mistake? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a criminal offence requires only general criminal intent, can evidence of specific intent or knowledge be obtained under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.