The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Herron, 900 F.2d 263 (9th Cir. 1990):
Whether a conspiracy exists, however, is a preliminary question which must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 175-76 (1987). In making this preliminary determination, a trial court is free to examine the putative hearsay statements of a coconspirator; i.e., the court is not obligated to look only at independent evidence in support of a showing that a conspiracy existed. Id. at 181; United States v. Layton, 855 F.2d 1388, 1401 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 1178 (1989).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.