What is the test for establishing there is evidence of conspiracy?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carlock, C085983 (Cal. App. 2019):
and during the alleged conspiracy." ' [Citation.]" (Ibid.) In addition, "[t]he existence of a conspiracy may be proved by uncorroborated accomplice testimony; corroboration of accomplice testimony is needed only to connect the defendant to the conspiracy." (People v. Price (1991) 1 Cal.4th 324, 444.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing "possible evidence to establish prima facie" of conspiracy? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is evidence of a conspiracy? (California, United States of America)
In what federal conspiracy cases have the jury been instructed to convict a defendant of conspiracy to commit a crime based only on "slight evidence"? (California, United States of America)
Does the prosecution have to avoid using relevant, persuasive evidence to prove an element of a crime because that element might also be established through other evidence? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is sufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Is there a "situation" where a plaintiff has been ordered to produce evidence under the Arizona Evidence Code under section 402 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
