What is the test for establishing that there is a reasonable possibility that a person can be found guilty of a crime in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Meza, E060426 (Cal. App. 2015):
The existence of a reasonable possibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. (People v. Austin, supra, 23 Cal.App.4th at p. 1610.) However, this showing "must rise
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence supporting a finding that a person who was found guilty of sexual assault by reason of abuse has been found guilty by a jury? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a jury has found that any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
If a jury finds that a person sentenced to death for a crime committed while on death row has not been found guilty of the crime, does this constitute a miscarriage of justice? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's recent finding that a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice in a sexual assault case has been found guilty of a similar charge in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
