What is the test for establishing that the accused initiated communication with the police after invoking his right to counsel?

Does a defendant have a right to counsel equal to that of the accused who has counsel? (California, United States of America)

Can a police officer continue to question a suspect after the suspect has invoked his right to counsel? (California, United States of America)

Does a suspect who has received and understood the Miranda warning, and has not invoked his Miranda rights, waives his right to remain silent by making an uncoerced statement to the police? (California, United States of America)

If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)

Is there any case law where the trial court erred in admitting statements he made during police interrogation after he invoked his right to counsel? (California, United States of America)

Does the exclusion of evidence intended to establish an accused's defense on a minor or subsidiary point interfere with that accused's right to due process law? (California, United States of America)

What is the effect of a police officer's lack of knowledge that a suspect had previously invoked his right to counsel? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for determining whether an accused waived his right to counsel and remained silent before making a statement to the police? (California, United States of America)

When questioning a minor suspect for the purposes of his right to counsel after the initial interrogation is over, can the minor continue to speak to the police officer? (California, United States of America)

What is the difference between a defendant's absolute right to counsel and his unqualified constitutional right to discharge counsel if he pleases and represents himself? (California, United States of America)