What is the test for establishing that a reasonable doubt has been found in a sexual assault case?

light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt].) But our strong presumption in favor of upholding factual determinations where reasonably possible in no way vitiates our responsibility to ensure that evidence sustaining a conviction is credible and of solid value, (People v. Hill (1998) 17 Cal.4th 800, 848, 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 656, 952 P.2d 673 ), and that inferences supporting a conviction are of such substantiality that a reasonable trier of fact could determine beyond a reasonable doubt that the

[354 P.3d 148]