What is the test for establishing that a protective order as to defendant's daughter was legally authorized?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Race, 18 Cal.App.5th 211, 226 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 (Cal. App. 2017):

4 Having concluded that the court's protective order as to defendant's daughter was legally authorized, we discuss the sufficiency of the evidence to support that order only to forestall defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim. In other words, we agree with the People that defendant has forfeited the issue of whether sufficient evidence supported the order because defendant not only failed to raise the issue below, but agreed to the issuance of the protective order. (People v. Trujillo(2015) 60 Cal.4th 850, 856-857, 182 Cal.Rptr.3d 143, 340 P.3d 371.)

** See footnote *, ante.

Other Questions


What is the authority of a court to order a defendant who has received legal assistance at public expense to pay all or part of the cost? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of establishing that a party defending against a motion of no confidence has the burden to establish that the motion is a protected activity? (California, United States of America)
When a fee order under review is ordered by a judge other than the trial judge, does the court have any discretion or authority to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Can a probation officer order a restitution order for a defendant who has not objected to the restitution order? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of contempt of court for his "willful and knowing violation" of a protective order or stay-away order? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal authority of a court to exercise discretion in making an order? (California, United States of America)
Does not offend equal protection principles by failing to provide capital defendants with the same procedural safeguards as non-capital defendants at the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.