The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Barrera, 872 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1989):
1 Barrera does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to establish her intent to distribute. That intent may be inferred from the value and quantity of the marijuana she possessed. See United States v. Savinovich, 845 F.2d 834, 838 (9th Cir.1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.