What is the test for establishing that a crime was committed by a non-criminal agency?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Smith, F075272 (Cal. App. 2020):

" '[T]he prosecution need not eliminate all inferences tending to show a noncriminal cause of [the harm]. Rather, the foundation may be laid by the introduction of evidence which creates a reasonable inference that the [harm] could have been caused by a criminal agency [citation], even in the presence of an equally plausible noncriminal explanation of the event.' [Citation.]" (People v. Ochoa (1998) 19 Cal.4th 353, 405.)

Other Questions

What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a crime committed while an accomplice is also involved in the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is an assault committed as an attempt to commit a crime separate and distinct from a crime? (California, United States of America)
Is the natural and probable consequences doctrine applied to a crime committed before the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
Is a crime committed in association with a gang if the parties relied on their common gang membership and the apparatus of the gang in committing the crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does a statute retroactively increase the punishment for a crime committed after the crime has been committed violate the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one? (California, United States of America)

Whitelogo nobg 300dpi sm

"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.