What is the test for establishing substantial evidence in a marriage trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cator v. Bakhtar, G041073 (Cal. App. 1/19/2010), G041073. (Cal. App. 2010):
We consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, and draw all legitimate and reasonable inferences to uphold the judgment. (Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of America (1985) 38 Cal.3d 892, 907.) The uncorroborated testimony of a single witness may constitute substantial evidence. ( In re Marriage of Mix (1975) 14 Cal.3d 604, 614.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing substantial evidence in a motion to overturn a decision of the trial court based upon the absence of substantial evidence to support it? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing substantial evidence against a defendant who alleges substantial evidence does not support his conviction? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for substantial evidence in the context of review for the purpose of establishing that substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
What is substantial evidence applied for a substantial evidence application to review whether an employer failed to pay a certain amount of wages? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding of substantial evidence under a substantial evidence standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes substantial evidence in the context of a motion to appeal against a finding of substantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have a duty to give an instruction that the prosecution substantially relies on circumstantial evidence to establish any element of the crime including the element of intent? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a reciprocal obligation to disclose all relevant evidence obtained before trial, including rebuttal evidence it intends to use at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
