California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Batis v. Nunez, C083489 (Cal. App. 2020):
Batis next argues the trial court erred in applying a preponderance of the evidence standard rather than a clear and convincing standard in determining whether the deed should be characterized as a trust. She points to the trial court's ruling that "the respondent has established the existence of the trust by the preponderance of the evidence." She maintains the preponderance of the evidence standard does not apply where the deed's express terms are inconsistent with a trust's establishment. In support, she cites Sheehan v. Sullivan (1899) 126 Cal. 189 (Sheehan).
Page 13
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.