What is the test for establishing a single conspiracy?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Arbelaez, 719 F.2d 1453 (9th Cir. 1983):

Appellants contend that the government did not prove a single overall conspiracy as set forth in the indictment, but instead proved multiple conspiracies resulting in a variance between the terms of the indictment and the proof at trial. In the instant case, our role is to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found a single conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt. 2 United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1340 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 464, 74 L.Ed.2d 614 (1982).

To establish the existence of a single conspiracy, as compared to multiple conspiracies, the basic "test is whether there was 'one overall agreement' to perform various functions to achieve the objectives of the conspiracy." United States v. Zemek, 634 F.2d 1159, 1167 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905, 101 S.Ct. 1031, 69 L.Ed.2d 406 and 450 U.S. 916, 985, 101 S.Ct. 1359, 1525, 67 L.Ed.2d 341, 821 (1981). Moreover, the "general test also comprehends the existence of subgroups or subagreements." Zemek, 634 F.2d at 1167. We have also said that "[t]he evidence need not be such that it excludes every hypothesis but that of a

Page 1458

To determine whether the evidence supports the existence of one overall criminal venture, relevant areas of inquiry include "the nature of the scheme; the identity of the participants; the quality, frequency, and duration of each conspirator's transactions; and the commonality of times and goals." Zemek, 634 F.2d at 1168; see, e.g., United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 158 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940, 94 S.Ct. 1945, 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (jury may find one overall scheme if each defendant "knew or had reason to know, that other retailers were involved ... in a broad project for the smuggling, distribution and retail sale of narcotics, and had reason to believe that their own benefits derived from the operation were probably dependent upon the success of the entire venture ....").

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing that the government has established the existence of a conspiracy and/or conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a single conspiracy as charged in the indictment or multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is a single conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is a conspiracy to establish that there was one overall agreement? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a single defendant has a "slight" connection to a conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between a single conspiracy and a multiple conspiracy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is clear established Federal law governing the meaning of the word "clearly established federal law"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that there is no conspiracy against each other? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing an establishment in Canada? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.