California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bayly, H035759 (Cal. App. 2011):
"As a condition precedent to challenging the exclusion of proffered testimony, Evidence Code section 354, subdivision (a), requires the proponent make known to the court the 'substance, purpose, and relevance of the excluded evidence . . . .' This requirement applies equally to establishing a hearsay exception." (People v. Ramos (1997) 15 Cal.4th 1133, 1178.) Having failed to ask for admission of the court records under Evidence Code section 452.5, defendant cannot fault the trial court for failing to grant it. (Ibid.) We agree with the Attorney General that this contention was forfeited.6
Page 20
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.