What is the test for establishing a defendant's guilt by circumstantial evidence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cloud, 1 Cal.App.3d 591, 81 Cal.Rptr. 716 (Cal. App. 1969):

The People may establish defendant's guilt by circumstantial evidence. 'If the circumstances reasonably justify the trier of fact's findings, the opinion of the reviewing court that the circumstances might also be reasonably reconciled with a contrary finding does not warrant a reversal of the judgment.' (People v. Hillery (1965) Supra, 62 Cal.2d 692, 702, 44 Cal.Rptr. 30, 36, 401 P.2d 382, 385, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 938, 87 S.Ct. 958, 17 L.Ed.2d 810.)

Other Questions


Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction where the evidence is based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's conduct after a crime relevant circumstantial evidence showing consciousness of guilt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for giving the jury an instruction that permissively informed the jury that "if" it concluded defendant fled after committing the attempted robbery, (1) evidence of flight may be considered evidence of guilt? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of domestic violence committed by the Defendant against the Defendant not inadmissible under section 1101 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the use of evidence of criminal street gang activity by a defendant to establish a predicate offence in a prosecution for active participation in a criminal gang constitute prejudicial or prejudicial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a defendant is successful in his claim that the Defendant failed to properly evaluate the Defendant's evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury acquit a defendant in a sexual assault case where the evidence relied mainly on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing substantial evidence against a defendant who alleges substantial evidence does not support his conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.