The following excerpt is from Aard-Vark Agency, Ltd. v. Prager, 2004 NY Slip Op 05395 (NY 6/24/2004), 2004 NY Slip Op 05395 (N.Y. 2004):
conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy' (O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [emphasis supplied]). A dismissal `with prejudice' generally signifies that the court intended to dismiss the action `on the merits,' that is, to bring the action to a final conclusion against the plaintiff. We have used the words `with prejudice' interchangeably with the phrase `on the merits' to indicate the same preclusive effect (citations omitted)."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.