What is the test for disclosure of a judge's "incorrect or irrational" or "misunderstanding" of the relevant law?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ayass, D074693 (Cal. App. 2019):

the issue [citation], or that its ruling embodied, or rested upon, a misunderstanding of the relevant law [citation] or an arbitrary or irrational point of view [citations]." (People v. Penoli (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 298, 305-306 (Penoli), italics added.) In addition, this unambiguous disclosure must demonstrate an "incorrect rather than a correct concept of the relevant law, 'embodied not merely in "secondary remarks" but in [the judge's] basic ruling.' " (Tessman, supra, 223 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1302-1303, italics added.)

Other Questions


Does disclosure of communications with a former attorney on a subject relevant to her current claim preclude disclosure of conversations with other attorneys? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any authority to increase the salaries of a superior judge or other superior judge during their terms of office? (California, United States of America)
When a judge makes a judgment in a minute order, does the judge have to deliver the abstract in an oral order? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have any authority to compel a defendant to renew his objection to the disclosure of his Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge be appointed to a superior court post after the election of a new superior court judge? (California, United States of America)
Can a trial judge order an ex parte viewing of a geographic location by a judge without the parties' consent? (California, United States of America)
Is a pensioner entitled to both a cost-of-living and a proportional share of the fluctuating salary of a judge occupying the office formerly occupied by a retired or deceased judge? (California, United States of America)
Does the law of the case doctrine preclude a litigant from seeking a writ of appeal against a finding that the trial judge was an impartial judge who failed to instruct on lesser included offenses? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 170.6, subdivision (2) of the Peremptory Challenge Act require counsel to disclose the identity of the assigned judge to counsel before counsel for the moving party learns that the assigning judge has been identified? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal judge's decision in a civil case allowing a frustrated prosecutor to seek a new judge? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.