California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Valdovinos, F072041 (Cal. App. 2017):
trial." ' [Citation.]" (Ibid.) "[T]he reviewing court must 'review each allegation and assess the cumulative effect of any errors to see if it is reasonably probable the jury would have reached a result more favorable to defendant in their absence.' [Citation.]" (People v. Williams (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 587, 646.)
"Having determined that no error occurred . . . , we conclude that this contention lacks merit . . . ." (People v. Heard (2003) 31 Cal.4th 946, 982.)
The judgment is affirmed.
/s/_________
DETJEN, Acting P.J.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.