The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Richardson, 927 F.2d 612 (9th Cir. 1991):
3 Richardson cites Holt v. Sarver, 300 F.Supp. 825 (D.Ark.1969) for the proposition that a punishment must satisfy "standards of good conscience and fairness." That language in Holt was used as a benchmark for assessing the conditions of confinement. The question whether the duration of confinement constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is governed by Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983), discussed infra.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.