What is the test for determining whether substantial evidence supports a jury's finding that Burgess possessed firearms in violation of his probation?

To decide whether substantial evidence supports the jury's finding that Burgess possessed firearms in violation of an express condition of his probation, " we review the whole record to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime ... beyond a reasonable doubt. " ( People v. Penunuri (2018) 5 Cal.5th 126, 142, 233 Cal.Rptr.3d 324, 418 P.3d 263.) We assess the evidence " in the light most favorable to the prosecution, " presuming " every fact the jury could reasonably have deduced from the evidence. " ( Ibid. ) We will not reverse unless it appears " "that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support" the jury's verdict. " ( Ibid. )

II. Section 29815 Requires a Binding Probation Condition

Section 29815 subdivision (a) provides: "Any person who, as an express condition of probation, is prohibited from

[275 Cal.Rptr.3d 175]