California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Cal.App.4th 1285, 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 808 (Cal. App. 1992):
The issue is whether the provocation precluded the defendant from deliberating. (See CALJIC No. 8.20.) This requires a determination of the defendant's subjective state. The court in People v. Wickersham (1982) 32 Cal.3d [2 Cal.App.4th 1296] 307, 185 Cal.Rptr. 436, 650 P.2d 311 impliedly referred to a subjective test: "[W]here the evidence of provocation would justify a jury determination that the accused had formed the intent to kill as a direct response to the provocation and had acted immediately, the trial court is required to give instructions on second
Page 815
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.