What is the test for determining whether an accused has a reasonable opportunity to prepare a defense and respond to the charges?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jetton, F065146 (Cal. App. 2014):
"To effectuate the constitutional rights to counsel and to due process of law, an accused must ... have a reasonable opportunity to prepare a defense and respond to the charges." (People v. Bishop (1996) 44 Cal.App.4th 220, 231.) The trial court's exercise
Page 10
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a jury to determine whether or not to consider appellant's youth in determining the reasonableness of any belief he had in the need to act in self-defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's mental impairment is an impairment when determining whether he acted in imperfect or complete self-defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's age, education, physical condition, and mental health are factors used in determining whether they should be charged with assault? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court apply the totality circumstance test to determine whether the police acted reasonably in responding to a complaint? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the charged offense is a natural and probable consequence of the charged offence? (California, United States of America)
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a search warrant can be used to determine whether or not a search and seizure of a suspect was unlawful? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's reasonableness of their conduct is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
