California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from California Teachers Assn. v. State of California, 20 Cal.4th 327, 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 425, 975 P.2d 622 (Cal. 1999):
In connection with the risk of erroneous results, we also must consider the "probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards" and the "fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail." (Mathews v. Eldridge, supra, 424 U.S. at p. 335, 96 S.Ct. 893.) The statute contains no procedures for assessing whether the teacher's position has potential merit or whether the costs of the hearing exceed the teacher's ability to pay. We may not assume on this facial challenge that teachers who are
Page 442
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.