What is the test for determining whether a sexual assault victim is sexually assaulted on a bus?

With regard to the second prong, the jury "'" . . . consider[s] such factors as the decreased likelihood of detection, the danger inherent in a victim's foreseeable attempts to escape, and the attacker's enhanced opportunity to commit additional crimes. [Citations.] The fact that these dangers do not in fact materialize does not, of course, mean that the risk of harm was not increased."' [Citation.]" (People v. Vines, supra, 51 Cal.4th at p. 870.)³

Page 7