The following excerpt is from Castro v. Paragon Indus., Inc., No. 1:19-cv-00755-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. 2020):
"reasonably co-extensive with those of absent class members," they "need not be substantially identical." Hanlon, 150 F.3d at 1020; see also Hanon v. Dataproducts Corp., 976 F.2d 497, 508 (9th Cir. 1992).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.