California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Casares, 198 Cal.Rptr.3d 167, 364 P.3d 1093, 62 Cal.4th 808 (Cal. 2016):
facts, select the rule of law, and apply it to the facts in order to determine whether the law as applied has been violated. [Citation.] We review the court's resolution of the factual inquiry under the deferential substantial evidence standard. Whether the relevant law applies to the facts is a mixed question of law and fact that is subject to independent review." (People v. Thompson (2010) 49 Cal.4th 79, 111112, 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 549, 231 P.3d 289.)
"[C]apacity to claim the protection of the Fourth Amendment depends ... upon whether the person who claims the protection of the Amendment has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded place." (Rakas v. Illinois (1978) 439 U.S. 128, 143, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387.) A legitimate expectation of privacy in a vehicle
[364 P.3d 1116]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.