The following excerpt is from Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2:11-cv-00995-MCE-DAD (E.D. Cal. 2013):
"In assessing an absent party's necessity under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 19(a), the question whether that party is adequately represented parallels the question whether a party's interests are so inadequately represented by existing parties as to permit intervention of right under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 24(a)." Shermoen v. United States, 982 F.2d 1312, 1318 (9th Cir. 1992).
Id. (emphasis added) (internal citations and quotations omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.