What is the test for determining whether a jury's verdict rests on the presumption as well as the evidence of the presumed fact?

Put differently, the first question is "whether the jury's verdict ... rest [ed] on that evidence as well as on the presumption[ ]...." (Yates v. Evatt, supra, 500 U.S. at p. 407, 111 S.Ct. 1884.)

The second question is "whether that evidence was of such compelling force as to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the presumption[ ] must have made no difference in reaching the verdict obtained"--in other words, whether the evidence of the presumed fact made the presumption superfluous. (Yates v. Evatt, supra, 500 U.S. at p. 407, 111 S.Ct. 1884.)