California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cua, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 190, 119 Cal.Rptr.3d 391, 191 Cal.App.4th 582, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 176 (Cal. App. 2011):
If a match is found, the next question is the statistical significance of the match. ( Henderson, supra, 107 Cal.App.4th at p. 778, 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 255; People v. Wilson (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1237, 1242, 45 Cal.Rptr.3d 73, 136 P.3d 864.) The analyst calculates the statistical probability that the DNA profile of a person, selected at **402 random from the relevant population, would contain the same pattern of alleles represented in the evidence sample. ( Venegas, supra, 18 Cal.4th at p. 65, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 262, 954 P.2d 525.)
When a suspect's sample is matched to the crime scene evidence, "the DNA profile of the matched samples is compared to the DNA profiles of other available DNA samples in a relevant population database or databases in order to determine the statistical probability of finding the matched DNA profile in a person selected at random from the population or populations to which the perpetrator of the crime might have belonged." ( Soto, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 518, 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 34, 981 P.2d 958.) "Experts calculate the odds or percentagesusually stated as one in some numberthat a random person from the relevant population would have a similar match." ( People v. Wilson, supra, 38 Cal.4th at p. 1239, 45 Cal.Rptr.3d 73, 136 P.3d 864.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.