What is the test for determining whether a defendant was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Milligan, B225563 (Cal. App. 2012):

In the second step, the trial court must decide based upon the facts it has found whether defendant was deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counseli.e., whether counsel's performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced as a result. (People v. Taylor, supra, 162 Cal.App.3d at pp. 724-725.) "To the extent that these are questions of law, the appellate court is not bound by the substantial evidence rule, but has '"the ultimate responsibility . . . to measure the facts, as found by the trier,

Page 15

Other Questions


Is a defendant deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when a trial court denies his motion to substitute one appointed counsel for another? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel violated by trial counsel's failure to challenge his prior strike? (California, United States of America)
Does substitute counsel violate a defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial violated his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether counsel's lack of diligence amounted to a denial of effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's argument violated his right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct on appeal argue that counsel's inaction violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.