The following excerpt is from Pimentel v. City of L. A., 966 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2020):
Here, there is no real dispute that the City is harmed because overstaying parking meters leads to increased congestion and impedes traffic flow. Without material evidence provided by appellants to the contrary, we must afford "substantial deference to the broad authority that legislatures necessarily possess in determining the types and limits of punishments." Bajakajian , 524 U.S. at 336, 118 S.Ct. 2028 (quoting Solem v. Helm , 463 U.S. 277, 290, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983) ).
Pimentel further argues that the City has proffered no quantitative evidence
[966 F.3d 941]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.